High Court for State of TelanganaWP/24371/2015allowed no costs

Sri Ganapathi Traders, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its, Principal Secretary

2015-08-05A Ramalingeswara Rao3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * * WRIT PETITION Nos.24369, 24371, 24378, 24388, 24392 and 24446 of 2015 Between:

M/s.R.K.Chillies and others.

....Petitioners and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Agricultural and Marketing Committee, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. ....Respondent (s) DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 05.08.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No Marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether His Lordship wishes to Yes/No see the fair copy of the Judgment?

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.24369, 24371, 24378, 24388, 24392 and 24446 of 2015 COMMON ORDER:

These Writ Petitions are being disposed of by this common order at the admission stage after hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The petitioners in these Writ Petitions are traders dealing with agricultural produce, livestock and products of livestock. They are required to apply for licence under Rule 48 of the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Rules, 1969. Rules 48 to 50 thereof provide for the procedure for issuance of licence. The petitioners applied for renewal of licence. They paid the requisite licence fee along with penalty amount imposed by the sixth respondent and in spite of the same, when the sixth respondent did not issue the licence in Form 8, the present Writ Petitions are filed.

It is not disputed by the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 6 that the petitioners have applied as per the procedure contemplated under the aforesaid rules, they are entitled for a licence and he has not received any adverse remarks against the petitioners for denial of licence. In the circumstances, these Writ Petitions are allowed directing respondent Nos.

the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________________ (A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J) 05.08.2015 vs