Koili Sandeep v. The State Of A.P.,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.P.No.2381 of 2015 ORDER:

The de-facto complainant and his counsel Sri Joseph are present. The accused Nos.1 to 5 and their counsel SriK.Rajasekhar are present.

Heard both sides.

On the report given by de facto complainant, the police, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada City registered Crime No.593 of 2012, conducted investigation and laid charge sheet against A1 to A5 for the offences under Sections 324 and 506 IPC read with 34 IPC. The parties and their counsel appeared before this Court today and submitted that both the parties are students and they have amicably settled their disputes at the intervention of the elders and as such the de facto complainant has no objection for quashing the proceedings and therefore, this Court may be pleased to accord permission to compound the offences and quash the petition in CC No.45 of 2013 on the file of the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, in the interest of justice.

Having regard to the above said submission and considering the fact that it is a dispute between the students who have amicably resolved their dispute peacefully and no useful purpose will be served if they are driven to trial and following the decision reported in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another (2012) 10 SCC 303) compromise is recorded in terms of accompanying compromise petition and consequently the proceedings in Crime No.593 of 2012 of Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada City are quashed in the light of the memo filed by parties.

In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date:25-03-2015 knl THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.P.No.2381 of 2015

Date: 25.03.2015 knl