Mr.Syed Abbas, v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.2508 of 2015 ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/A6 in Crime No.218 of 2014 of Mailardevpally Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, registered for the offences under Sections 447, 427, 420, 468 and 471 read with 34 IPC. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor representing the State.

A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner is A6 and second respondent is de facto complainant in Crime No.218 of 2014. As per the allegations made in the complaint, the petitioner along with A4 and A5 has created forged document with an intention to grab the property of the de facto complainant.

The court has to take into consideration the allegations made in the complaint only while deciding the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court is not justified in embarking upon an enquiry to ascertain reliability or genuineness of the allegations made in the complaint at the initial stage of investigation. The material placed on record is prima facie sufficient to investigate into the matter in order to ascertain the truthfulness or otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the principle enunciated in R.P.Kapoor v State of Punjab[1] and State of Haryana v Bhajan Lal[2], I am of the considered view that this is not a fit case to quash the criminal proceedings at the threshold. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the concerned Police may be directed not to arrest the petitioner till completion of investigation. In view of the principle enunciated by the Hon'ble Apex

Court in Arnesh Kumar v State of Bihar[3], the Station House Officer, Mailardevpally P.S., is hereby directed to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 41A Cr.P.C., in Crime No.218 of 2014 so far as the petitioner/A6 is concerned.

With the above direction, the criminal petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in the criminal petition, shall stand closed.

_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J April 16, 2015.

YS [1] AIR 1960 SC 866 [2] AIR 1992 SC 604 [3] 2014 (8) SCALE 250