← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/13877/2015dismissed

Adari Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2015-12-28T.Sunil Chowdary2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.13877 of 2015 ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Crime No.230 of 2015 on the file of the Station House Officer, Muvvalavani Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, registered for the offences under Sections 420, 354A and 506 I.P.C.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State.

3. A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner is the sole accused and the second respondent is the de facto complainant in Crime No.230 of 2015.

4. As per the allegations made in the complaint, the petitioner assured that he will secure a good job to the second respondent if she pays an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- to him. The second respondent paid an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- to the petitioner to secure a job in Co-operative Bank, Hyderabad Branch. It is further alleged that the petitioner misbehaved with the second respondent and threatened her with dire consequences.

5. While exercising the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Court has to take into consideration the allegations made in the complaint only. The Court is not justified in embarking upon an enquiry as to probability, reliability or genuineness of the allegations made in the complaint at the initial stage of investigation. The material placed before the Court is prima facie sufficient to investigate into the matter in order to ascertain the truthfulness or otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in R.P.Kapoor v. State of Punjab and State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal, I am of the considered view that it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings at the initial stage of the investigation.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the concerned Station House Officer may be directed not to arrest the petitioner till completion of the investigation.

8. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to direct the Station House Officer, Muvvalavani Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, not to arrest the petitioner/accused in Crime No.230 of 2015 till completion of the investigation.

9. With the above direction, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

10. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J Date: 28.12.2015 Ivd