Tagili Hari Krishna, v. The State Of Telangana,
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13833 of 2025 This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court for grant of bail to the Petitioner who is arrayed as accused in FIR No.1157 of 2025 of KPHB Colony Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, registered for the offence punishable under Section 69 of BNS, 2023.
2.
The brief facts of the case are that, on 08.09.2025, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that she acquinted with petitioner herein in the year 2019 and the petitioner is the resident of Aleru Village, which is adjacent to her village Boppally, Telkapally, Nagarkurnool and on one day, the petitioner herein physically exploited her under the pretext of marring her and later, he denied to marry the de-facto complainant. Hence, the complainant requested to take necessary action. Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case for the above said offence.
3.
Heard Sri D. Ravi Kumar Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri Arun
Kumar Doddla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the said allegation and there is no such offence committed by him and whatever, the relashipship between parties is a consensual relationship and there is no date of offence mentioned in the complaint and he is in jail from 11.09.2025 and the material part of the investigation was already completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to him by allowing this criminal petition.
5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the allegation leveled against him is serious in nature. Further, the investigation was not yet completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.
6.
In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner is in jail from
11.09.2025. Further, as seen from the record, the petitioner and the de-facto complainant were in relationship from the year 2019 and LWs 1 to 10 witnesses were already examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, stage of investigation, and the duration of incarceration, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner/accused, subject to the following conditions.
i.
The petitioner/accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of learned IV Additional Junior Civil Judge-CumXV Additional Metropolitan Magsitrate, at Kukatpally.
ii.
The petitioner/accused shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the
purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.
iii.
The petitioner/accused shall abide by conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).
7.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 31.10.2025 TU
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13833 of 2025 Date:31.10.2025 TU