M Arun Kumar, Hyd v. Union Of India, Secunderabad
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 291 OF 2017 Appeal under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act against the Judgment dated 27-09-2016 made in OA ll (U).No.190 of 2O11 on the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderbad Bench.
Between:
It/ Arun Kumar, S/o M. Janardhan Rao, Aged about 15 years, Occ Student, Being minor represented by his father and natural guardran, M. Janardhan Rao, S/o Late M. Chinnappa, Aged about 40 years. Occ Private Employee, R/o H. No.18-3-508/93/1 , Shivaganga Nagar, Chatrinaka, Hyderabad ...Appellant / Applicant AND Union of lndia, Rep. by its the General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad ... Res po n den tRes pon d e n t Counsel for the Appellant Smt N.S. Geetha Madhuri Rep. Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent :
Sri P Bhaskar The Court delivered the following Judgment :
o U J A G F THE HON RABL SRI USTICE N SH BHEE MAPAKA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.291 OF 2OL7 IUDGMENTI Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Smt. Geetha Madhuri, learned counsel representing Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
2.
Permission is accorded.
3.
Recording the said submission, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to CoStS.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in _-l this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, shall stand closed A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMA JOINT REQTSTRAR "" v"^ \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, The Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench at Secunderabad One CC to Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri P Bhaskar, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies Vtugh t
HIGH COURT DATED:2710112025 .\ -4?:a--''
t/,'^'a = ';'
JUDGMENT
(i CMA.No.291 of 2017 t il P ^r{ (, 2W fl I il ?,.
4 T C H E DISMISSING THE CMA AS WITHDRAWN L LD