G. Ramachandra v. The Govt. Of A.P.

[ 3255 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 1683 OF 2017 Between:

G. Ramachandra, S/o. Naganna, aged about 53 years, Working as Superintendent, O/o The Director General, Drugs and Copyrights, Drugs Control Administration, Vengalarao Nagar, Hyderabad, R/o. Plot No.16, Sidharth Nagar, Kalyan Nagar, Hyderabad 500 038. ...PETITIONER AND '1 . The Govt. of A.P., rep. by its Prl. Secretary, I\/edical & Health Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad - 22.

2. The Director General, Drugs and Copyrights, Drugs Control Administration, Vengalarao Nagar, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the applicant for promotion to the post of Assistant Director (Non-Technical) in the existing vacancy though the applicant is senior most in the category of Superintendents in the office of the 2nd respondent and fully eligible and qualified for the said post as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and also violation of principles of natural justice and further direct the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for promotion to the post of Assistant Director (Non-Technical) in the existing vacancy by convening: Departmental Promotion Committee with all consequential benefits including seniority, monetary etc. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.KRISHNA Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.1683 OF 2077 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded to the same. 2.

Recording the submissions of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (fR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

SD/. G. SIREESHA / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / ( SECTION OFFICER To

1. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

2. One CC to SRI B.KRISHNA, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies PSK.

GJP q \ //TRUE COPY//

!

HIGH COURT DATED:0610112023

ORDER

WP(TR).No.1683 of 2017 i,rE st:4l-F t [ 1 tiB 2[8 .t:j \\, DrsMtssrNG THE WR|T PETITION (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

@'vw 3o\t\ts