Narineedi Srinivas v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI WRIT PETITION No.30861 of 2018 ORDER:

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Industries appearing for 1st respondent, the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for 2nd respondent and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for 3rd respondent.

It is stated by the Counsel on both sides that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is covered by Order, dated 30.10.2017, in W.P.No.34465 of 2017.

Therefore, for reasons alike, this Writ Petition is also disposed of with the following directions: "The petitioner is at liberty to approach, either, the learned Magistrate before whom the vehicles were said to have been produced and file application as per the procedure established by law and seek release of the vehicles by bringing to the notice of the Court the policy decision taken by the Government and the terms of the G.O.Ms.No.15, dated 19.02.2015, if the petitioner so desires; or, in the alternative he may make a request to the 2nd respondent by filing appropriate application for release of the vehicles; and, if any such application is filed before the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent is at liberty to pass appropriate orders as per terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, dated 19.02.2015, after examining the competence and jurisdiction to release the vehicles, which were said to have been produced before the Court concerned. It is needless to state that the application, if any, filed by the petitioner before either the Court or the 2nd

respondent shall be disposed of on the same day in the interests of justice".

There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________ A.V.Sesha Sai, J 29th August, 2018 smr