Siddharth, Secbad v. Smt. Akanksha, Secbad

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1891 OF 2013 Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Order dated: 14.03.2013 in FCOP No. 313 of 2011 of the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court at Secunderabad.

Between:

Siddharth, S/o. Jaikumar Motilal, aged 35 years, Occ: Business, Ri/o. Plot No. 18, ICRISAT Colony, Secunderabad.

...REVISION PETITIONERYRESPONDENT/RESPONDENT AND Smt. Akanksha, W/o. Siddharth, aged 30 years, Occ: Nil, Rl/o. Flat No. 206, Maruthi Green Ville Vikrampuri, Road No.1, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONERY PETITIONER CRPMP. NO: 2536 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated: 14.03.2013 in l.A. No. 91412012 in FCOP No. 3'13 of 201 '1 of the Judge Family Court, at Secunderabad to extent of awarding maintenance of Rs. 10,000/- per month to the respondent herein and an amount of Rs. 15,000/- towards the legal expenses, pending disposal of this Revision Petition. For the Petitioner: SRl. MANJARI S GANU, ADVOCATE For the Respondent: SRl. PRATAP NARAYAN SANGHI, ADVOCATE The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.,I891 OF 2013 ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is arising out of order dated.14.03.2013 passed in 1.A.No.914 of 2012 in F.C.O.P.No.313 of 2011 on the file of Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad, whereunder the petition filed by the petitioner-wife under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act for interim maintenance was in allowed in part granting interim maintenance @ Rs.15,000/- per month. Aggrieved by the same, the revision petitioner-husband preferred this appeal. 2.

When the matter came up for hearing today, it is reported by the learned counsel for revision petitioner that the main O.P itself disposed of long back and nothing remains in this revision for adjudication.

3.

Accordingly, recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infrcutuous. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/- T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// -i SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Judge, Family Court at Secunderabad2. One CC to Sri. MANJARI S GANU, Advocate [OPUCI

3. one CC to Sri. PRATAP NARAYAN SANGHI, Advocate IOPUCI

4. Two CD Copies

5. One Spare Copy.

LS \ -..- \}K"

HIGH COURT DATED:21 10612022 2 $ [uB 2[Il C) i './

ORDER

GRP.No.1891 of 2013 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

t