Palutla Samuel Abilash v. The State Of Telangana

[ 32s1 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY , TWOTHOUSANDANDTWENTYFOUR LPRESENT l;:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITIO N NO: 12891 OF 2023 Between:

Palutla Samuel Abilash, S/o P Prasad, Age 35 years, Occ: Private Employee' Flat No 501, Cmr Residency Near HP Gas Godown, LIC Colony, Viiayawada (Urban). Krishna, Andhra Pradesh - 520008 ...PETITIONERYACCUSED No.2 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its, Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO.COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the Petitioner/Accused No.2 by granting anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime in F.l.R.No.597 of 2023 dt 22.05.2023 on the file of Madhapur Police Station, Cybarabad District, for the offences U/Sec. 420,406,498-A,489-D,r/w 34 lPC.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G ESWARAIAH, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER

, THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.12891 of 2o.23 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner/accused No.2 seeking anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with F.I.R No.597 of 2023 on the file of the Madhapur Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 42O, 406, 489-A and 489-D r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned t I Additional Fublic Prosecutor for the respondent-State and perused the record.

3.

The case against the petitioner is that he was involved ln cheating the de facto complainant for Rs.25.OOLakhs. Having asked for an amount of Rs.25.0olakhs, when the petitioner had taken the said amount, he convinced the de facto complainant that the amount would be doubled 4.

Since the case is one of cheating the de facto complainant and giving him fake currency notes, this Court

is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. However, in the event of the petitioner surrendering before the concerned Court within (15) days from the date of this order and filing an application seeking regular bail, the same shall be disposed off on rierits within (02) working days by giving notice to the Public Prosecutor.

5.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed.

tI Sd/- Mohd.Sanaullah Ansari ASSlsTAl.lr4EGItrRAR SECTIMTOFFICER //TRUE COPY// To ,iHI"€{{{H3iH,J,rFilv:ffi r#rs".#rlil,*i.f#3""{''t'r*" B*%8# to*!]l ."*o*rAH' Advocate [oPUc] . Two CD CoPies PR gh &(- it 1,-q

u$'s HIGH COURT DATED: 2310112024 tt II h S s o Y {t + tt/ :) UE Zl,24 a L t t

ORDER

CRLP.No.12891 ot 2023 SPATCHeu '4, I I I ffi DISPOSING OF THE CRL.PETITION gr