Mohammad Israr Uddin v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.14026 OF 2025 ORDER :

This criminal petition is filed under Section 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, by the petitioner/A.2 seeking regular bail in connection with Crime No.162 of 2025 of Pitlam Police Station, Kamareddy District. The offences registered against the petitioner are under Sections 109, 132, 351(3), 121, 292 and 281 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNS') and under Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.

2.

The facts of the case are that on 10.10.2025 the complainant along with other officials are conducting vehicle check at about 1.15 hours at Maddela Cheruvu, the petitioner along with A.1 have driven Thar vehicle bearing No.TG 08 C 2013 in a rash and negligent manner. The complainant stopped the said vehicle and went for checking the petitioner along with A.1 abused him in filthy language and slapped the complainant and also damaged his Samsung Tab. Further they also threatened the complainant and other officials that they will drive their vehicle as they wish and if anyone tried to stop their

- 2 - vehicle they will run over the vehicle on them. Hence, case was registered against the accused for the above offences. 3.

Heard Sri V.Raghunath, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Ms V.Sanjana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D.Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.

4.

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner herein is A.2 and he is jail from 10.10.2025 and no offence under Section 109 of BNS is committed by the petitioner and he has not driven the vehicle. As such, requested this Court to grant regular bail to the petitioner. 5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail on the ground that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature and the accused have obstructed the public servant from discharging their duties and also assaulted the defacto complainant and driven the vehicle to cause injury to the complainant. As such, petitioner is not entitled for bail at this stage as the investigation is not yet completed. Hence, prayed this Court to dismiss this petition.

- 3 - 6.

Having regard to the submissions made and the material on record, it is seen that though there is offence under Section 109 of BNS there is no such intention to cause injury. Considering the averments of complaint and the period of incarceration of petitioner in jail from 10.10.2025 and the progress in investigation, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions : i.

The petitioner/A.2 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of I-Additional Sessions Judge at Nizamabad.

ii.

The petitioner/A.2 shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Wednesday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner/A.2 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 483(2) of BNSS.

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date :04.11.2025 Rds

- 4 - THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.14026 OF 2025 DATE :04.11.2025 Rds