Marapaka Pushpa Latha v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 33021 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 34980 OF 2023 Between:
'1. Marapaka Pushpa Latha, D/o. Rayamaflu, Aged about. 36 years, Occ. House Wife, H.No.1-105, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 53, Mancherial District.
2. Marapaka Dhanalakshmi, D/o. Ra/amallu, Aged about . 35 years, Occ. Hou. Wife, H.No.1-105, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 53, Mancherial District.
3. Ramilla Bharathi, D/o. Dharmaiah, Aged about.43 years, Occ. House Wife, H.No.1-103, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 299, Mancherial District.
4. Marapaka Rajeswari, D/o. Gattaiah, Aged about . 35 years, Occ. House Wife, H.No. 1-106, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 303, Mancherial District.
5. Aktapuram Venkatamma, D/o: Pocham, Aged about . 37 years, Occ. Hou Wife, H.No.2-4, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 400, Mancherial District.
6. Marapaka Padma, D/o. Bheemaiah, Aged about.43 years, Occ. HouseWife, H.No.2-71, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 94, Mancherial District.
7. Aktapram Rajeswari, D/o. Pocham, Aged about.34 years, Occ. HouseWife, H.No.2-4, Thallapally Village, Naspur [t{andal, SES No. 400, Mancherial District.
8. Ramilla Sarada, D/o. Dharmiah, Aged about . 38 years, Occ. House Wife, H.No.1-103, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 299, Mancherial District.
9. Bandari Kavitha, D/o. Bapu, Aged about . 36 years, Occ. House Wife, H.No.189/3, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 275, Mancherial District. , l0.Marapaka Sardda, D7o. Rajaiah, Aged about . 36 years, Occ. House Wife, H.No.1-107/1, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 54, Mancherial District.
11.lngu Lalitha, D/o. Balaiah, Aged about . 47 yearc, Occ. House Wife, H.No.355-, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 143, Mancherial Districl. l2.Aktapuram Vi:nkatahma, D/o. Bhanaiah, Aged about. 36 years, Occ. House Wife, H.No.1-108, Thallapally Village, Naspur Mandal, SES No. 306, Mancherial District.
...PETITIONERS AND1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Land Acquisition Department), Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Mancherial District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial Revenue Division, Mancherial District.
4. The Tahsildar, Naspur Mandal, Ivlancherial District.
5. The General Manager, , Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur Area, Ivlancherial District.
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 3 to 4 in not conducting enquiry to include the names of the petitioners in the social economic survey report to extend the RandR benefits like wages and house site pattas to the petitioners as per the order dated 14-03-2022 in Writ Petition No.14220 of 2020 by considering the petitioners representation dated 14-1 1-2O23 and also in pursuance of the proceedings in Rc.No.
C2021 4t8612O22 dated 22-11-2022 of the 2od respondent is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law, apart from violation of principles of natural justice, besides violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents No. 3 and 5 to consider the representation dated 14-1 1-2023 of the petitioners to include the names of the petitioners in the social economic survey report to extend the RandR benefits like wages and house site pattas to the petitioners as per the order dated 14-03-2022 in Writ Petition No.14220 of 2O2O.
lA NO: 't OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No- 3 and 5 to consider the representation dated 14-11-2023 of the petitioners to include the names of the petitioners in the social economic survey report to extend the RandR benefits like wages and house site pattas to the petitioners as per the order dated 14-O3-2O22 in Writ Petition No.14220 ot 2O2O, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI N INDRASENA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI P. SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC The Court made the following: ORDER I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.3498O of 2o23 ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking the following reliet "...to issue o uit, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaing the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 4 in nol conducting enquiry to include the names of the petitioners in the SociaL Economic Surueg report to extend the R&R benefits like utages and house site pattos to the petitioners as per the order dated 14.03.2022 in Wit Petition No.14220 of 2O2O bg consideing the petfiioners' representation dated 14.11.2023 and also in pursuance of tLe proceedings in Rc.No.C2O214/86/2022 doted 22.11.2022 of *Le respondent No.
2 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to laut, apatt from uiolation of prtnciples of natural justice, besides uiolation of Articles 14, 21 ond 3O0-A of the Constitution of India and consequentlg direct the respondents Nos.3 and 5 to consider the representation doted 14.11.2023 of the petitioners to incLude the nomes of the petitioners in the Sogial Dconomic Surueg report to extend the R&R benefits t lik{wages and house site pattas to the petitioners os per the order dated 14.03.2022 in Wit Petition No.14220 of 2020..."
SK,J w.l'. No.34980 of 2O23
2. Heard learned counsel appea-ring for the petitioners, and learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearirlLg for the respondent No'1' learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos'2 to 4 and Sri P'Sri Harsha Reddy' learnedStandingCounselappearingforrespondent No.5.
3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearrng for the petitioners' without going intomeritsofthecase,thisWritPetitionisdisposedof withadirectiontotherespondentstodisposeofthe representation hled by the petitioners on 14' ll'2023 by considering the orders passed by this Court dated 14.O3.2O22 in W.P'No'14220 of 2020' within eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order' There shall be no order as to costs'
I \ \
SK,J W.P.No.3498O of 2O23 4.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
sD/. P PSBTiil+R[t,3iRRI //TRUE COPY/'
\,.
SECTION OFFICER To, 1.
The Principal Secretary (Land Acquisition Department), secretariat, The state of Telanoana, HYderabad.
The Disfict Colli;ctor, Mancherial District.
iii; R;6G Diviiionat officer, Mancherial Revenue Division, Mancherial District.
itre Tansibar, Naspur Mandal, Mancherial District. fhe eeneiii Manag'er, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.
one bc to Sri N. lndrasena Reddy, Advocate [oPUC] on; aa io Sri p. Sri nrrsha Reddy, SC for Siniareni Colleries[OPUC] i,i,io CCs-i" Gp for Land Acquisitibn, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTJ iiro'CCs to dP fo/Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
TJ GJP
HIGH COURT DATED:2911212023
ORDER
r\5 STAI€ WP.No.34980 of 2OZ3 q oo [ / rtB 2024 7_ C, i.\ rt i :o L'sPrrta''
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
Gqior Glcc--