Ranjeet Singh Chawla v. State Of Telangana,

II [ 3251 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9251 OF 2018 Between:

Ranjeet Singh Chawla, Occ - Business, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad.

R/o.H.No.1-3-1 B3l4Ol18B, SBt Cotony, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND I pl?!" of Telang^ana_,_Rep.by its Public prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. 2 M.Venugo.pal, S/o.M.Sudhakar Reddy, R/o. Near Budvel Raiiwdy Station, Katedan, RajendarNagar'RangaReddyDistri6t'

...RESpoNDENTS/..MpLArNANT'

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the CC No.45/2018 on the fite of the Special Magistrate-ll, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar, as against the petitioner/Accused herein. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the CC No.4Sl201g on the file of the Special Magistrate-ll, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar. LA. NO: 2OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that In the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in CC No.45l201g on the file of the Special Magistrate-ll, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar including appearance of the Petitioner/Accused herein, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition.

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C RAGHU , Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appears for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.9251 OF 2Ol8 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner-accused would submit that the petitioner-accused was convicted by the trial Court. Therefore, the cause in the criminal petition no longer survives for adjudication and has become infructuous. 2.

Recording the said submission, the Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.

3.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand t..

SD/- V. KAVITHA ASSlSTANT REGISTRAR clo sed.

//TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER To,

1. The Special Magistrate-ll, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar

2. The Station House Officer, Mailardevpally Police Station, Cyberabad.

3. One CC to Sri C. Raghu, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana (OUT)

5. Two CD Copies BJLB/JAK $

a HIGH COURT DATED:0311112023

ORDER

( 1 rTE STAIei v 2 7 JA!'l 202[ z qJoo o ]\ CRLP.No.9251 ol 2018 * ( \-'

t Dro P,111.t \ CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS @t"f*K