J. Gajanand v. The Deputy Director Of Tribal Welfare Officer

[ 32s5 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRES ENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 4669 OF 2017 Between:

J. Gajanand, S/o Dhansing, aged about 43 Years. School Assistant (English) Government Ashram High School, Anarpally, Kerameri Mandal, Adilabad District. ...APPLICANT AND 1.

The Deputy Director of Tribal Welfare Officer, I.T.D.A., Utnoor, Adilabad Dist. The Project Officer, l.T.D.A., Utnoor, Adilabad Dist., The Commissioner of Tribal Welfare, Govt. of Telangana, at Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

4.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Ariicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare that the applicant is entitled to be transferred to the schools situated in agency area of Adilabad District on the basis of the entitlement points in the ensuing transfer counseling since the applicant was appointed/posted in plain area with all consequential benefits in terms of Notafication issued in G.O.Ms.No.3 SW dt.10.01.2000 by holding the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the applicant for transfer to plain area schools is illegal and contrary to the Notification vide G.O.Ms.No.3, dt.10.01.2009, discriminatory and unjust.

Counsel for the Applicant : SRl. K NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : ORDER

I HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.4669 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

SD/-B. CHANDRA PRAKASH ASSISTADLI REGISTRAR (Jr, SECTION OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY//

1. One CC to SRl. K NARAYANA, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies KAR w us

HIGH COURT DATED:1 511212022 1 liE s IAIe a f

ORDER

o U 3 0 Jlil 20'73 \. -,/ \.'

WP(TR).No.4669 of 2017 ir -.'p,11 ,l '

DrsMtsstNG THE WR|T PETITION(TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS Gqe \1"

til[':