C.Ramesh Reddy, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad And 3 Others v. Dr.Doodala Bharathi, Secunderabad And 4 Others
[3317 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
.
ATHYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 108 OF 2012 Appeal Under Order 43 Rule 1 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree dated 06-01-2012 made in lA NO. 113 of 2011 in O.S.NO. 154 of 2004 on the fite of the Court of the lX Addl. Chief Judge (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad Between:
1. C.RAMESH REDDY, S/o.Raghava Reddy, Aged 58 years, R/o.H_No.8-36841311512, Navodaya Colony, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad.
2. Smt.C.Laxmi, W/o C.Ramesh Reddy, (died) per LRs
3. C.Ritesh Reddy, S/o.C.Ramesh Reddy, A,ged 24 years, Occ: Student Ryo.Ptot No.270, Road No.78, Phase-lll, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.
4. C.Rohit Reddy, S/o.C.Ramesh Reddy, Aged 21 years, Occ: Student Ryo.Ptot No.270, Road No.78, Phase-lll, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. ...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 5 TO 8 AND
1. DR.DOODALA BHARATHI, Wo.late D.Rama Rao Retd Civil Surgeon R/o. H.No. 9-1-69 [171],33, Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
2. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Floor No. 3, Gruhakalpa Buildings, Nampally, Hyderabad.
3. The Jubilee Hills Co-operative House Buidling Society Ltd, [TA 173], rep by its Special Officer, Road No.17-A, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.
4. Smt.D.Rama Bharathi, Wo. A.Vasudeva Rao, IRTS Ryo.Flat No.201, Francies Apartments, West Marredpally, Secunderabad.
5. D.S.Murthy, IAS [Retired], S/o.late D.Rama Rao R/o. Plot No.'18, Simhapuri Colony, West Marredpally, Secunderabad.
(R2 to R5 are not necessao '"n'"].1*r""oNDENTS/RESpoNDENTS 1,2&3 Counsel for the Appellants: SRI N. ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI S.R SANKU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: None appeared The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
THE ] ON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM Alll-HER AND THE HO {'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHETIMAPAKA CIVIL 4rscELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1O8 <rf 2OL2 JUDGMENI: ( er Hon'bte Dr.sA,t) Hearri. P )rused the record 2.
In the c,urse of submissions, it is brought lo thr: notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the appe ll,:rnt:; that the subject ma:ter o'the appeal has become infructuous 3.
The said ;ubmission is taken on record.
4.
Accordin ly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal :; dis;missed as infructuous. N I ,trder as to costs Miscellan lc)us petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- M.VI.IAYA BHASKAR JOINT REGISTRAR | 1l) SECTION OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY// JX;,r, Oo L Chief Judge (FTC). City Civit court, Hyder:rbad (,ruith Records, if . One CC tc S;Rl N. ASHWANT KUMAR Advocate [OPU()J . One CC tc SRI S R SANKU Advocate [OpUC] . TwoCDC,pes J KKS BK
HIGH COI. RT DATED:0I 11212022 a,l Al-s (,1i '( .;+ /"
,rl l !r \t 1t [?.1 1\11 ) i :';,.
JUDGMET T CMA.No.1 tB of 2012 DISMISSIN G OF THE CMA AS INFRUI)TUOUS WITHOUT 3OSTS 2:
t \ 7) g9L \, I