Tippani Hariprasad v. State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.32129 of 2018 O R D E R:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.

2.

According to the petitioners, they are the victims of the extremists violations wherein they said to have lost their respective fathers. They are aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not extending the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.50, General Administration (SC.A) Department, dated 21.02.2014 wherein the Government fixed financial assistance of Rs.5,00,000/- to the family members of those who lost their lives in the extremist activities. 3.

It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that the petitioners submitted their applications in the office of the concerned District Collectors for extending the said benefits in terms of the said G.O.Ms.No.50, General Administration (SC.A) Department, dated 21.02.2014. It is further stated that apart from the petitioners, 21 other persons also submitted their applications claiming benefit in terms of the said G.O. It is further stated that the Superintendent of Police, Adilabad has forwarded 38 proposals in respect of the dependant families of the Civilians killed in extremist violence for sanction of exgratia along with the required documents for its scrutiny as per G.O.Ms.No.50, General Administration (SC.A) Department, dated 21.02.

2014 and after verification with regard to the genuinity and eligibility, the Intelligence Department, Telangana State submitted its report stating that out of 38 applications, only 36 are found to be genuine for sanction of exgratia. It is also stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that despite the same as there was no action on the part of the respondent authorities in extending the benefit as per G.O.Ms.No.

Administration (SC.A) Department, dated 21.02.2014, petitioners were contained to file representations dated 23.07.2018, 24.07.2018, 26.07.2018 and 27.07.2018, but no action has been taken on the said representations. 4.

In fact, when the matter is taken up, the order of this Court in W.P.No.30756 of 2018, dated 28.08.2018 is placed on record by the learned counsel for the petitioners wherein this Court directed the respondents to take appropriate action and to complete the exercise within a period of two months.

5.

In view of the above order in W.P.No.30756 of 2018, dated 28.08.2018 and taking into consideration the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents 2 to 6 to verify the claims of the petitioners herein and take action strictly in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J Date:17.09.2018 grk

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.32129 of 2018 Dated 17.09.2018 grk