K. Srikanth, v. The Deccan Grameena Bank,

[ 3301 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO: 27960 OF 2014 Between:

K. Srikanth, S/o. Manohar, Age 27 years, Occ ; Typist-cum-clerk, in Decc-an Grameena Bank, Regional Office, Adilabad, Adilabad District. Rlio.H.No.3-3-69, Ashok Road, Near City Zems School, Adilabad, Adilabad District. PETITIONER AND The Deccan Grameena Bank, Nallakunta, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chairman. RESPONDENT Petition Under.

Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner for appointment as Office Assistant in the respondent bank on preferential basis than the outside candidates in pursuance of the notification issued by the respondent on 30-8-20',t4 as illegal' arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as office Assistant on preferential basis than the outside candidates in pursuance of the notification issued by the respondent on 30-08-2014 in view of his continuous seryice in the respondent bank since, 2OO4 in the interest of justice.

.ii'

l.A.NO:1 OF 2014(WPMP . NO: 35022 OF 20141 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as Office Assistant on preferential basis than the outside candidates in pursuance of the notification issued by the respondent on 30-8-2014 in view of his continuous service in the respondent bank since, 2004 in the interest of justice pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl S.RAVI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI S.SURENDER REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent : SRI S.MUJIB KUMAR The Court made the following ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRJ JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.2796O of 2Ol4 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondent-bank in not considering the case of the petitioner for appointment as Office Assistant on preferential basis than the outside candidates in pursuance of the notification, dated 30.08.20 14, issued by it.

2.

When the matter is taken-up for hearing, Sri S.Ravi, learned counsel representing Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to efflr.rx of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 3.

Recording the submission made above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. No costs. SD/- P. PADMANABHA R ASSISTANT REGIS DY //TRUE COPY// To SECTION FICER

1. One CC to Sri S.Surender Reddy, Advocate [OpUC]

2. One CC to SriS.rVtuiib Kr;r;,;a;;;6i6;,t[l ,o.. ,*j CD Copies cJP 1*4==

HIGH COURT DATED:2011012023 o T T ua'

.e r,'

1, t l:l vZo .r/ im \ur L-)

ORDER

p WP.No.27960 of 2014 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

4.

>3