Adila Parveen, v. The State Of A.P.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.38898 of 2013 ORDER:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2.

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under:- "...to pass an order, direction or a Writ Particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents 1 to 4 conducting the investigation against the Respondents 6 & 7 connection with Crime No.284 of 2012 filed U/Sec.420, 506 R/w 34 I.P.C. 156(3) Cr.P.C. as illegal arbitrary and violative of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to hand over the investigation of the case to Respondent No.5 which was registered by Respondent No.4 P.S.Chandrayanagutta, Hyderabad vide Crime No.284 of 2013 filed U/Sec.420, 506 R/w.34 I.P.C. & 156(3) Cr.P.C. and pass ..."

3.

Learned Government Pleader placed on record the written instructions issued to their office in the month of November, 2019 by the Inspector of Police, Chandrayangutta Police Station, Hyderabad. 4.

From the perusal of the said written instructions, it is revealed that subsequent to the registration of Crime No.284 of 2013 by the Chandrayangutta Police Station, investigation was completed and charge sheet was filed before the concerned Court. After taking cognizance of the offences, the case is numbered as C.C.No.284 of 2013. When C.C.No.284 of 2013 was pending trial, the matter ended in compromise before the Lok Adalat on 16.12.2014.

5.

In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that no cause would survive in the writ petition.

6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

___________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J 11th November 2019 mar