Shwetha Ponna And ANR v. N.Govindan And 4 ORS
[ 3281 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 759 OF 2013 Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the Order and Decree made in M.V.O.P. No.13 of 2005 dated 24.05.2008 on the file of the Court of the Chairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum- Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad.
Between:
1. Swetha Ponna Wo.late Maj Mohan Ponna S.M. Housewife
2. Master Anish Ponna, S/o.late Maj Mohan Ponna S.M. Student, Being Major rep by his mother and natural guardian Petitioner No.'l Both R/o.1 1-1-24611, Mylargadda, Seethaphalmandi, Secunderabad. I ...Appellants AND
1. N.Govindan, S/o.Narayana Nayar, Aged 56 yrs,Occ: Driver, R/o.No.5, Venkatachalapuram, Udumalai Road, Potlachi, Tamilnadu.
2. The Tamil Nadu Road Transport Corporation, rep by its Managing Director Office at Chennai3. Uma Devi Ponna, Wo. Col Sarveshwaram Ponna, Aged 61 yrs, Occ: Teacher, R/o. R/6, AWHO Colony, Sector "C", Sikh Road, Secunderabad.
4. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbator Divisional-l) Ltd rep by its lvlanaging Director, Having its office at 37, Meftupalayam Road, Coimbator.
5. Lt Col Sarvesh varam Ponna, S/o.Manikyam Ponna, Rio. []./6, AWHO Colony, Sector "C", Sik r Road, Secunderabad.
..Respondents Counsel for the App rllants: SRI VIVEK JAIN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 4: SRI C. SUNIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 5: SRI S. PRASADA RA(l Counsel for the Respondent No.1: NONE APPEARED The Court made the lollowing: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI M.A.C.M.A.No. 759 of 20'13 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'bte Justice G. Sridevi) At the time when the matter is taken up for hearing, tearned Counsel for the appettants seeks permission to withdraw the appeat.
Permission as sought foris accorded.
Accordingty; the M.A.C.M.A. is dismissed as withdrawn. There shatl be no order as to costs.
Miscettaneous petitions, if any pending, shatl stand ctosed. ) T SD/.K.ONESIM DEPUTY Lt# lr)vu \ //TRUE COPY// SECTI To, 1'TheChairman,M.A.C.T-Cum-lAdditionalChiefJudge,CityCivilCourt, Secunderabad (with Records)
2. One CC to Sri Vivek Jain, Advocate IOPUC]
3. One CC to Sri C. Sunil Kumar Reddy, Advocate {OPUCI
4. One CC to Sri S. Prasada Rao, Advocate IOPUC] GJ \ .V
5. Two CD CoPies T
HIGH COURT DATED:06109t2022 ^,'
,t.fs =\= tch .o ('.
.n i a-l a :..
;a;l'/
JUDGMENT
MACMA.No.759 of 2013 DISMSSNG I'HE MACMA AS WITHDRIIWN WITHOUT CoSTS \ \qf'{"-