G. Nagasree Lakshmi, v. The State Of Ap. Rep Byi Ts Secretary And 3 Others

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.838 of 2016 Date:07.01.2016 Between:

G.Nagasree Lakshmi, W/o G.Hemanth Kumar and 79 others.

..... Petitioners And:

The State of A.P., reptd by its Secretary, Municipal Admn. & Urban Development Department, Hyderabad and three others.

.....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr. P.Gangarami Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP for Municipal Admn. (AP) The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Apprehending that respondent No.3 may remove parts of their properties for the purpose of widening the existing Tilak road of Anantapur city, the petitioners have filed this Writ Petition.

At the hearing, Mr. S.D.Goud, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3, on instructions, submitted that so far, no proposals for widening the existing Tilak road have been initiated by respondent No.3 and that if and when such proposals are initiated, the Corporation will strictly follow the provisions of Sections-146 or 147 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955,

as the case may be.

This submission of the learned Standing Counsel is placed on record and the Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.1016 of 2016 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.

____________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY 07th January, 2016 DR