High Court for State of TelanganaWP/9977/2017dismissed as infructuous
Kuthadi Rohini, v. The Union Of India,
2017-07-122 pages
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. BALAYOGI WRIT PETITION No. 9977 of 2017 ORDER: (Per VRS,J) It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the purpose, for which the writ petition was filed, has been served. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J ________________ N. BALAYOGI , J 12th July, 2017 cbs
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN √ AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. BALAYOGI Writ Petition No.9977 of 2017 (dismissed as infructuous) 12th July, 2017 cbs