Annapureddy Radhakrishna Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR, JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION NO: 31549 OF 201 8 Between:

Annapureddy Radhakrishna Reddy, S/o. A. Rami Reddy, Aged 33 years, Hindu, Occ,Business, R/o. Plot NO. 204, Srinivasa Nagar Colony, Beside Sai Ganga Function Halls, Keesara, Medchal District, Telangana State. ...pETlTlONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Transport Department, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State. The Regional Transport Officer, Office of the Regional Transport Authority, Uppal, Medchal District,Telangana State.

The Assistant Motor Vehicles lnspector, Vishnupuram, Nalgonda District, Telangana State ...RE'P.NDENTS J Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more preferably.one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in not releasing the petitioners Contract Carriage Vehicle bearing No. TS 08 UA 1214 seized under Vehicle Check Report No. TS605/May2016/5005, dated, 08.05.2016 by the 3rd Respondent, as per law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to forthwith release the petitioners Contract Carriage Vehicle R. No.

TS 0B UA 1214, in the interest of justice and grant such other necessary relief or reliefs as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to release the petitioners Contract Carriage Vehicle bearing No. TS 08 UA 1214 seized under Vehicle Check Report No. TS605/May2016/5005, dated:08.05.2016 by the 3rd Respondent, forthwith to the petitioner, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAJANIKANTH JWALA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION No,31549 of 2O18 /

ORDER

Heard. Perused the record.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and therefore, this writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.

3. Taking the said submission on record, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION FICER To \ '1. One CC to Sri Rajanikanth Jwala, Advocate tOPU-Cl Z. two CCs to GP f6r Transport, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies

4. One Spare CoPY sm NPJt

I HIGH COURT OATEDi21l1212021

ORDER

WP.No.31549 of 2018 \r!!: v r.rr'6 I Jc o 14 rEB 202 rJ t)6.,!pa.r c * DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS ?)