Meruva Madhusudhan Reddy v. The State Of Telangana And 6 Others
[3183 I HIGH COTIRT FOR THE STATE OF TI,LANGANA AT HYDERABAI) (Special Original Ju risdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY THTRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 43557 OF 2022 Betrveen:
Meruva Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o Ramireddy, Occ Pvt. Ernployee, R/o 10-549, Ramalakshmamma Street, Near Vivekananda Vidyapeetam, Mrkapuram, Markapur, Prakasam, A.P. 523316.
...PETITIONER AND l. The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Conrmissioner ofPolice, Hyderabad City Police. Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Policc, Panjagutta, Hyderabad.
4. The Station House Officer, SR Nagar Police Station, SR Nagar, Hyderabad.
5. Darla Naveen, Mobile No. 88855 59049. Address not known to the petitioner.
6. Jayanth Kumar, Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Gajulamandyanr Banch, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh.
7. Darla Narayana, Mobile No. 9493904822 Address not known to the petitioner. ...RESPONDEN'TS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.4 in not registering the complaint dated 23-ll-2022 given by the petitioner against respondents No.5 to 7, as unconstitutional, arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to register the complaint dated 23-11-2022 given by the petitioner against respondent 5 to 7 Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. NAGESHWAR RAO PUJARI Counsel for the Respondents I to 4 : AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURAB],E SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRltl PETITION No.43557 OF 2022 ORDER:
Heard learnerl counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Governmerrt Pleader for Home.
I 2.
This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent No.4 not registering the complaint of the petitioner dated 23.11.2022 made against respondent Nos.S to 7. 3.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home has submitted written instructions stating that upon receipt of complaint from the petitioner on 24.11.2022 by the Station House Officer, SR Nagar Police Station, General Diary (GD) entry was made and on enquiry, it is revealed that there is a civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. Thereby, the complaint was closed as 'Civil in Nature' on 24.II.2O22 ar,d the same was also intimated to the petitioner. 4.
On perusal of the material available on record, it seems that the complaint was closed on the same day when the intimation was given to the petitioner.
5. In vier,r, of the above facts and circumstances, the writ petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail the
) appropriate legal remedy, if he is so aggrieved with the closure report.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
II sD/-A.V.s. PRASAD //TRUE COPYI/ ASSISTANT Ji',,,",* To, SECTION l. One CC to SRI. NAGESHWARRAO pUJARIAdvocate [OpUC]
2. Two CCs to AGp FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT BVRJ DATED:231122.022 -:
)+ t, tl^l,!
ORDER
WP.No.43557 ol'2022 WP IS CLOSEI) WITH NO COSTS