Vanteru Prathap Reddy, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRLP.Nos.373, 374, 413 and 415 of 2014 COMMON ORDER :

These Criminal Petitions are filed in quashing the FIR Nos.277 of 2013 of Gajwel Police Station, Medak District, 135 of 2013 of Gouraram Police Station, Medak District, 355 of 2013 of Toopran Police Station, Medak Dsitrict and 124 of 2013 of Mulugu Police Station, Medak District respectively were registered against the self same accused i.e., Vanteru Prathap Reddy, who impugned the applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

2) When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that in the above crimes, the police concerned filed a referred report after completion of the investigation under Section 173 Cr.P.C and no cause survives for adjudication in this criminal petition and the same has become infructuous. Needless to say the Magistrate can take cognizance from that material or from any protest petition of de facto complainant by proceeding as a private complaint procedure, invoking Section 190 Cr.P.C read with 200 Cr.P.C, remedy is left open to the petitioner before appropriate forum and at appropriate time.

3) Recording the said submission, the criminal petitions are dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the criminal petitions shall stand closed.

___________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J 08.06.2015 knl

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRLP.Nos.373, 374, 413 and 415 of 2014

Date. 08.06.2015 knl