Vemula Santhosh Kumar v. The State Of Telangana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11038 OF 2022 Between:

Vemula Santhosh Kumar, S/o.Surya Prakash Rao, Aged 46 years, Occ.pvt employee, Fl/o.KR Colony, Theeegalaguttapalli, Karimnagar Rural and Mandal

...Petitioner/Appel lanUAccused

AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad

2. Vemula Mary Daya Sravanthi, Wo. Vemula Santhosh kumar, Age.41 years, Occ.govt employee, Rl/o.KR Colony, Theeegalaguttapalli, Karimnagar Rural and Mandal ...RespondenU Defacto-Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the judgment of conviction in S.C No 1 05 of 2019 dated. 23-12-2019 pending on the file of Prl. Asst Sessions Judge, Karimnagar. l.A. NO: 2OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CRL.A.No. 08 of 2020 in S.C.No.105 of 2019 dated 2311212019 pending on the file of Prl. Asst. Sessions judge, Karimnagar pending disposal of the present criminal petition. !

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Cdminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner for compromise in Crl.A No 0B of 2020 against S.C No 105 of 2019 daled 2311212019 passed judgment of conviction, in terms of the accompanied compromise memo and to pass such other or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminat Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri VANAPARTHI VAISHALI, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri K. SRIDEVI, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITIO NO.1103A OF 2fJ22 ORDER:

l Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the cause in the present Criminal Petition does not survive and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Petition. 2.

Permission is accorded.

3.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. I Sd/. B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI N OFFICER To, 1 . The Prl. Assistant Sessions Judge, at Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

2. The Station House officer, Police Station Karimnagar, Rural Karimnagar District.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.(OUT)

4. One CC to SRl. VANAPARTHI VAISHALI' Advocate [OPUCI

5. One CC to SRl. K. SRIDEVI, Advocate [OPUCI

6. Two CD CoPies.

PR A\\>-

HIGH COURT KSJ DATED:1311212022 y.9 (.- '

q $ g lr|l 2ul -l o !) ii ,i'-rt:r;'r'. ''..

ORDER

CRLP.No.11038 of 2022 I-HF, CRITII\AI- PEI'ITION IS DISMISSED AS WITI{DRA\\'N >2 A\-tix