M.N.R Educational Trust v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No. 25615 OF 2009 DATED 4TH FEBRUARY, 2015.

BETWEEN M.N.R. Educational Trust, Sangareddy, Medak District, Rep. by its Administrative Officer.

....Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and ors.

...Respondents.

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No. 25615 OF 2009 ORDER:

This Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the action of respondents 1 to 9 in not taking action against the tenth respondent. Heard Sri B.Purushotham Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader appearing for Respondents 1 to 9 and Sri P.Venkat Reddy, learned Counsel appearing for tenth respondent.

The sum and substance of the case of the petitioner is that despite representation submitted by the petitioner herein,

official respondents failed to take action against tenth respondent herein.

This Court issued Rule Nisi on 23.02.2010. In response to the Rule Nisi, a counter affidavit is filed by the ninth respondent-Sub Inspector of Police, Sangareddy Rural Police Station, Medak District stating inter alia that on the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 17.11.2009, a case in Crime No. 306 of 2009 under Sections 448, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC was registered on the file of Station House Officer, Sangareddy Rural Police Station, Medak District, and that the police arrested all the accused and later they were remanded to judicial custody and that after obtaining wound certificate, necessary charge sheet was filed before the Court of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Sangareddy and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.1262 of 2009 and the same is pending trial. In respect of the incident that took place on 18.11.

2009, it is stated in the counter affidavit that the Sub Inspector of Police along with force took the tenth respondent and his 140 followers into custody and shifted them to Sangareddy Rural Police Station by arresting them under Section 151 Cr.P.C. and by registering a suo motu case in Crime No. 307/2009 on the file of the Station House Office, Sangareddy Rural Police Station. The counter affidavit of the ninth respondent further states that no untoward incidents have happened at the Educational Trust of the petitioner and that a constant patrolling is watched at the Educational Trust of the petitioner besides deputing two constables at the campus to avert the untoward incident.

In view of the subsequent developments, this Court absolutely does not find any further reason to probe into the matter.

In view of the aforesaid reasons and having regard to the steps taken by police, this Writ Petition is closed. Miscellaneous petitions pending consideration if any in the Writ Petition shall stand closed in the light of the aforesaid order. No order as to costs.

--------------------------------- JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI DATED 4TH FEBURARY, 2015.

Msnrx