Gangamma v. The State Of A.P.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRL.P.MP.Nos. 11753 & 11755 OF 2017 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.14719 OF 2016 ORDER:

CRL.P.MP.Nos. 11753 & 11755 OF 2017 These miscellaneous petitions are filed under Section 320 of Cr.P.C seeking permission to compound the offences punishable under Sections 420, 498(A), 324 r/w 109 I.P.C. The defacto complainant and accused are present and they are identified by their respective counsels and produced Photostat copies of Aadhar cards to prove their identity. A joint memo of compromise dated 30.10.2017 is filed. When terms of compromise are explained in vernacular language, they are admitted to be true and correct Further, it is now submitted that, both the defacto complainant and the petitioners/accused 2, 4 to 8 voluntarily entered into compromise due to intervention of elders and well-wishers and they wanted to lead peaceful life. Therefore, I find that the compromise is voluntary in the interest of both parties and permission is granted to compound the offence. Hence, compromise is recorded in terms of the joint memo filed along with these petitions. Accordingly, both the petitions are ordered.

MSM,J CrlP_14719_2016 Crl.P.NO.14719 OF 2016 In view of the orders passed by this Court in CRL.P.MP.Nos. 11753 & 11755 OF 2017, this criminal petition is allowed.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand closed. No costs.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date:01.11.2017 SP