Mahmood Khan v. The State Of Telganana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.M.P.No.17891 of 2014 in Crl.P.No.16597 of 2014 and Crl.P.No.16597 of 2014 Common Order:

The de-facto complainant and her counsel Sri R.G.Shiva Kumar are present. Accused and their counsel Sri K.Sai Babu are present.

Heard both sides and perused the petition.

The de-facto complainant lodged FIR No.163 of 2014 with Kalapathar PS against the accused for the offences under Sections 465 and 384 IPC and investigation is stated to be pending. It is submitted that at the intervention of elders, parties have settled the matter in respect of offences under Sections 465 and 384 IPC and entered into a compromise and hence the compromise may be recorded and proceedings in Cr.No.163 of 2014 on the file of PS Kalapathar, Hyderabad may be quashed in the interest of justice. Having regard to the above said submission and considering the fact that it is a financial matter and parties have amicably settled the disputes among themselves, and no purpose will be served even if the parties are driven to trial and following the decision reported in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another[1] this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and compromise is recorded and consequently the proceedings in Cr.No.163 of 2014 on the file of PS Kalapathar are quashed.

In the result, both the petitions are accordingly disposed of.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J 19-01-2015 Murthy [1] (2012) 10 SCC 303