Panimgipalli Sri Rama Venkata Satyanarayanacharyulu v. State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

High Court for the State of Telangana The Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan and The Hon'ble Dr. Justice Shameem Akther Writ Petition No.41595 of 2018 Date: 13-06-2019 Between:

Smt. Tejavath Vijaya

...Petitioner

and The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Dept., Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad and 2 others.

...Respondents

Counsel for the petitioner:

Mr. K. Laxmaiah Counsel for the respondents:

Mr. S. Sharath, Spl. G.P.

The Court made the following:

HACJ & Dr. SA, J W.P.No.41595 of 2018 Dt: 13-06-2019 Order: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan) This writ petition is filed for issue of a writ of habeas corpus for production of the petitioner's husband, namely Mr. Tajavath Shankar (for short 'the detenu'), before the Court, and to set him at liberty, by setting aside the detention order in Proceeding No.C2/3127/2018 dated 14-08-2018, passed by respondent No.2, the Collector, Suryapet, and the consequential GO.Rt.No.1238 dated 28-06-2018, passed by respondent No.1, the Principal Secretary (Home), State of Telangana. By interim order dated 04-01-2019, this Court had temporarily released the detenu on certain conditions. Today, this Court is informed that the detenu has been scrupulously following those conditions while he is set at liberty from the preventive detention.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenu was preventively detained by order dated 14-08-2018. Thus, merely two more months need to go by before the detenu would be set at liberty permanently. Therefore, he pleads that the interim order dated 04-01-2019 should be continued by this Court.

HACJ & Dr. SA, J W.P.No.41595 of 2018 Dt: 13-06-2019 The learned Special Government Pleader for the State has vehemently opposed the plea raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

Having considered the fact that there is no evidence to show that the detenu has disturbed the public order while he is at liberty, no fruitful purpose would be served by preventively detaining him again for the remaining period of two months. Therefore, this Court directs that the interim order dated 04-01-2019 shall continue till 13-08-2019, the date on which the detention period would come to an end by afflux of time. With these directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, stand disposed of as infructuous.

______________________________ (Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, ACJ) _____________________ (Dr. Shameem Akther, J) Dt: 13th June, 2019 lur