K. Saidaiah v. The State Of Telangana

[ 325s ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO IHOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR WP(TR) NO: 5175 OF 2017 Between:

1. K. Saidaiah, Son of Gopaiah, aged 57 years, Occ:S.1., Women P.S., Resident of Near Rotary Colony, Khammam, Khammam District.

2. M.A.Rawoof, Son of Khasim, aged 52 years, Occ: S.l. of Police, Khammam CCS, Resident of Nizampet, Khammam District.

3. M. Ananda Raju, Son of Kantiaha, aged about 53 years, Occ: S.l of Police, Control Room, Kothagudem, Resident of Wyra, Khammam District. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Khairatabad, Hyerabad.

3. The Deputy lnspector General of Police, Warangal Range, Warangal District.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Khammam, Khammam District., ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned orders issued by the 3rd respondent in C.No.E11192/2013-15 (RO No.B03/2015) dated 18.11.2015 consequently direct the respondents to continue the applicantS as S.l's Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. RAVI SHANKER Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOUI{ABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No. 5175 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the then Andhra Pradesh Administrative Trrbunal, Hyderabad by order dated I1.t2.2015, passed the following interim order:- "In view of the above circumstances, the impugned proceedings issued by the 3'd respondent in C.No.E1/192/2013-15 (RO No.803/2015) dated

18. 1 1. 20 1 5 are suspended. "

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the interim order dated 71.12.2015, no further orders are required in the writ petition (TR) and pray this Court to close the writ petition (TR). Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has acceded to the same 3.

Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Writ Petition (TR) is closed. 4.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

SD/. MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTA]JI REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I (7P SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to Sri P Ravi Shanker Advocate IOPUCI

2. fwo CCs to GP For Home, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies TVIBC GJP

HIGH COURT DATED: 0310312023 T a I ?ffi .it I I .) '_) *1i ..:

:,!-:

ORDER

WP(TR).No.S175 of 2017 i :

I cLosrNG THE WP(TR) WITHOUT COSTS