The Depot Manager v. The Honble Labour Court

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.17392 of 2010 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the record relating to and connected with I.D.No.127 of 2003 on the file of the 1st respondent-Labour Court and quash the award dated 10.09.2007 passed therein holding it as illegal and arbitrary.

Heard learned standing counsel for the petitioner corporation and Ms.K.Udaya Sri, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. It has been contended by the petitioner corporation that the 2nd respondent workman was appointed as Conductor in the corporation on 29.03.1979. While so, a charge sheet was issued to the 2nd respondent alleging certain cash and ticket irregularities. After initiating disciplinary proceedings and after conducting regular enquiry and for the proven misconduct, the disciplinary authority had removed him from service vide orders dated 18.11.2002. Questioning the same, the 2nd respondent unsuccessfully preferred an appeal and thereafter raised an industrial dispute in I.D.No.127 of 2003 on the file of the 1st respondent-Labour Court under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Labour Court without properly appreciating any of the contentions raised by the corporation, passed an award dated 10.09.2009 setting aside the order of removal and directing the corporation to reinstate the 2nd respondent into service

AKS, J W.P.No.17392 of 2010 without back wages. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ petition is filed.

Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent has contended that the Labour Court has rightly passed the award in favour of the 2nd respondent and, therefore, no interference is called for. This Court, having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, is of the considered view that the Labour Court has rightly passed the award in favour of the 2nd respondent. Further, no illegality or irregularity is pointed out by the learned standing counsel for the petitioner corporation in the award passed by the Labour Court. Unless and until any illegality or irregularity is pointed out by the learned standing counsel for the petitioner corporation in the award passed by the Labour Court, this Court cannot interfere with the award. There are no merits in the writ petition.

Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

______________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J 14th November, 2018 ajr