← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/14365/2025allowed no costs

Dinesh Kumar Abhishek v. The State Of Ts

2025-11-14K. Sujana5 pages

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.14365 OF 2025 ORDER :

This criminal petition is filed under Section 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioner/Accused No.1 seeking enlargement on bail in connection with Crime No.1786 of 2025 of Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 109, 118(1), 351(2) read with 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, 'BNS').

2.

The brief facts of the case are that, on 12.09.2025, the defacto complainant, lodged a report with the police stating that the petitioner, along with other accused persons, assaulted his son with an intention to kill him. As a result of the said assault, his son sustained grievous injuries and lost consciousness. The petitioner inflicted injuries using sticks, following which the victim was admitted to the hospital for treatment. Based on the said complaint, the police registered a case against the petitioner and other accused persons for the aforementioned offences.

- 2 - 3.

Heard Sri Aadi Shiva, learned counsel representing for Smt. Krishnamoni Swathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D.Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.

4.

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent of the allegations made against him and has been in judicial custody since 12.09.2025. He further submitted that there is no intention to kill the injured witness and the petitioner was false implicated in this case and that the material part of the investigation has already been completed. Therefore, prayed this Court to grant bail to the petitioner. 5.

On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, contending that the allegations against the petitioner are severe in nature. The injured witness had sustained serious injuries and is currently undergoing treatment in the hospital and that the investigation is still ongoing. Therefore, prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.

- 3 - 6.

In light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon a perusal of the material available on record, it is evident that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 12.09.2025. As recorded in the remand case diary, prosecution witnesses LWs.1 to 13, including the investigating officer, have already been examined. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, including the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, and the duration of incarceration, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner-accused No.1, subject to the following conditions: i.

The petitioner-accused No.1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned VIII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar.

ii.

The petitioner-accused No.1 shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the

- 4 - purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner-accused No.1 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 14.11.2025 SS

- 5 - THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.14365 OF 2025 DATE :14.11.2025 SS