← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWA/1093/2011dismissed as infructuous

R.S.Madhusudhan, Hyderabad v. M.D., Apsrtc., Hyderabad And 3 Others

2022-09-13Abhinand Kumar Shavili,K. Sarath3 pages

,< [ 3308 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WR|T APPEAL NO: 1093 OF 2011 Writ Appeal under clause '15 of the Lelters Patent Appeal preferred against the order daled 17.08.2011 in W.P.No.20051 of 2002 on the file of the High Court. Between:

R.S.Madhusudhan, S/o. Late R.D. Shankar Narayana,Aged about 47yrs,Occ: Typist, E.No. 271782, Rlo. 34-21, Jagathg irigutta, Post;IDPL, Hyderabad- 37 ...APPELLANT AND

1. APSRTC, Reptd. by its lr4anaging Director, lt4usheerabad, Hyderabad,

2. The Executive Director (Hyd.Zone), A.P.S.R.T.C, IvlGBS, Gowliguda, Hyderabad.

3. The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., l\,4edak Region, Sangareddy, Medak District

4. The Depot N4anager, .A.P.S.R.T.C, Bus Depot, Zaheerabad, Medak. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:SRl V NARASIMHA GOUD Counsel for the Respondents:SRI N VASUDEVA REDDY(SC FOR RTC) The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICI' K. SARATH W.A.No. 1093 of 2O11 ORDE]R (per AKS,J):

i \[/hen thc mi]ttcr is takcn up for hear-ins. ilrc lc:;trnecl counscl :eppcarir-rg for thc appellanl has info.tnr,,-i tlrr. (,.r,urr that thr-. causc in th<: Writ Appcal clrtcs no1 sLrr.\ r\.{) :,rrrl rltus rcnrlt:ring thc \\rrtt Appcal as inlruclr-rous. 2.

Rccorcling the said submissior), thc Wr-it Appcal ]S disrlissccl as infructuous. No cosls l\4isccllrrrrr:ous ltcliLions pcndine. if artr. sluri s(lrncl closr:cl.

SD/. M. MANJULA DEPUTYAEGISTRAR <1b SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, . one CC to SRI V NARASIMHA GOUo {!v99{e-tof uC-l- ^. o;; aa io sni ru vASuoevn REDDY(sc FoR Rrc) [oPUc] . Two CD Copies EDS*cW

HIGH COURT D,ATED:1 310912022 ffi'u>:

\ v\\

ORDER

WA.No.1093 of 2011 t I t1 tr )l .r .,'/ ',1 i DISMISSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL AS ITIFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS Or**rN',v