P. Pentaiah, v. Mrs. Vijaya,

,'..i r .'ii!,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYOERABAD

e.h *.,,,YtJ'

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO N M c N OF Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the resoondents 1 t; 4- r., 'inJi. wirfur and deriberate fliJ[:1i",:t,;r theuorders'dateo s1'os zdt t'r"]."i',""'w.p r'ro.ssis "i zoot ri :

.'

I 'rf :: i{Fi ii$.

. !;, ,i,r f Between:

P. Pentaiah, S/o. Muttaiah, Rl/o. H.No.7_1 1 gl2, pedda Amberpet, Mandal, Ranga Reddy District Hayathnagar AND ...PETITlONER ' H$ay,3[i;,Y.,ndal Revenue officer, Presenfly Abduilahpurmer, Ransa

2. Mr. Naveed, Mandal Revenue lnspector, presenfly The Mandal Revenue off icer Abduflahp u rmet, Ra n gJ'n-&-or-D i" til"i " " " r "' "

3. Mr. Madhusudhan Reddv Revenue Divisjonal Officer, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy Dist.

'j,i _;;- i f ji..i&f'l jl!: .*.

ii,,61rtr ti.._.3;

tl.$*ffi.r#i:*;'

r..t:..4,i-,,i..nd .: {"d' r. Ti 1i (Leave granted to lmDlead R-_3_as-per Court Order dated:10-03-2017 in Appt.No.les/20i7 in bc.No.46-e;-iii-"

4. Mr. lmaran Khan. Truck Ooerators Highway Amenities Socrety (TOHAS). Chairman/TransDort Commrsloner, 5th and 6th Floor, B.R.K.R. Bhavan.. Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS ounsel for the petitioner : SRI V. yEDU KRTSHNA SAINATH, Advocate SRI. K RAMAMOHAN "!

c j:!r't i:.J{;

Counsel for the Respondents: ASSTSTANT Gp FOR ASSTGNMENT (TG) The Court made the following ORDER:

.lE-',- r'j'-+ri'ut t'

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE '.SREENIVAS RAO CONTE PT CASE No.459 of 2OL7 ( ORDER:

Heard Sri V.Yedu Krishna Sainath, learned counsel representing Sri K. Ramamohan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2.

During the course of hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner filed this contempt case for gross violation of the order, dated 31.03.2011 passed by this Court in W.P.No.5525 of 2005. Subsequently, this Court passed another order in the very same Writ Petition on 26.04.20L8 and the order passed by this Court on 31.03.2011 is no more in existence.

3.

In view of the subsequent order passed by this Court on 26.04.2OL8, no further adjudication is required in the present contempt case.

4.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to avail the remedies as available under law, if any other grievances are existing. No costs.

) Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed' ';

i#{ Sd/. K. SAILESH] OEPUTY REGISTRAR \ cQ-- //TRUE COPY// 1.,9.

f SECTION OFFICER To,

1. Two CCs to GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (TG), High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad. {OUTI it i,t:

.'i,, iiF;l 'l''

o::a.r. '

.{ "'1S '.'

2. 'One CC to SRl. K'RAMAMOHAN, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD copies.

Cvk&am g u .}tI*f &1 . ..i , i-.!_.

1...4-+.;

_.. ?' '

JiI t +, :J jri, ;

'i ..

/ HIGH COURT DATED:2911212023 ii ) a t.

HE STA r{- ( 'e l a)iJ ilAB 2024 +t , i, l;

)r, * .cO SPATC\ t.

t It + .t.

'r 'lE.i,

ORDER

) CC.No.469 of 2017 i- &A _t!._tl !i l It .:i .if.

CC is Closed.

..i;'

+_ i.

\e\ ,tt ,\