Sri. Kankula Janardhan Reddy, v. The Convener, Ts Lawcet, For The Year 2016-2017

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.3712 of 2017 ORDER:

The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: "to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent No. 4 denying the Admission in 3-Years LLB., Course, after collecting the necessary fee under the Management Quota and not permitting the Petitioner to attend the classes and Semester Exams as illegal and arbitrary, and further, direct Respondent Nos.1 to 3 to confirm the petitioner's Admission in LLB., 3 Years Course at Respondent No.4 College and pass such other Order(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper."

Heard Mr. Police Venkat Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Abhishek Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2, Mr. Ch.Jagannadha Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3 and Mr. P.S.P.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.4.

The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is despite receiving the necessary fee from him under the Management quota, respondent No.4 is denying admission and not permitting him to attend the classes in 3-year L.L.B.course. According to the learned counsel for respondent No.4, as per the University norms, the requisite qualification to get

AVSS, J WP.No.3712 of 2017 Dated:07.02.2017 admission into L.L.B. course is 45% aggregate marks in the qualifying examination and the petitioner secured only 44.18% of marks. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In fact, a copy of memorandum of marks of the petitioner is also placed on record. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for respondent No.4 that respondent No.4 is ready to pay back the amount and return the certificates to the petitioner.

In the absence of any statutory violation or procedural infirmity, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief in favour of the petitioner.

For the afore-said reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.4422 of 2017 filed by the petitioner for interim relief shall stand dismissed as infructuous.

___________________ JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI 07thFebruary, 2017 DR