Smt. Nazia Begum v. The Government Of Telangana Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.31236 of 2014 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. 2.

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under:- "...to issue Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd & 3rd respondents in interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members at the behest of the 4th respondent without any complaint or FIR being registered against the them, thereby disturbing the peaceful life of the petitioner and her family members and threatening to settle the land dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the principle laid down by this Hon'ble Court that the police shall not interfere when the nature of the complaint is civil nature apart from being in contravention to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court that after filing of the writ petition, the matter has been settled between the petitioner and the 4th respondent and, therefore, no further cause would survive in the writ petition. 4.

Learned Government Pleader also brought to the notice of this Court that pursuant to the complaint lodged by the 4th respondent herein, a case in Crime No.488 of 2014 for the offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 IPC was registered and investigation was taken up. Except investigating in the above said crime, the respondent police never interfered with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members at the behest of the 4th respondent.

5.

In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause would survive in the writ petition and the same is liable to be closed.

6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J 20th December 2019 mar