M. Rama Kishore v. The State Of Telangana
[32s6 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 34649 OF 2024 Between:
'l . M. Rama Kishore, S/o. M.Venkaiah,Aged about .50 Years, Occ. Business Rl/o Flat No.4A, Mytri Nilayam Plot nol36, Phase-lX, KPHB Colony Kukatpally, Hyderabad - 500085.
2. G.Srinivasa Rao, S/o. G.Chalamaiah Aged about 51 Years, Occ. Business r/o MIG-|-131, Phase-lX, KPHB Colony Kukatpally, Hyderabad - 500 085. ...PETITIONERS AND
1. The State of T6langana, Rep. by the Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat Telangana, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.
3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District.
4. Telangana State Housing Board, 4th Floor, T.H.B. Commercial Complex Opp. Shiva Parvathi Theatre, tv'lain Road Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, direction. order or orders. more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus in declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner is from their peaceful possession over the property admeasuring 2710 Sq. yds., equivalent to 2265.56 Sq. Mtrs., situated in Sy.No. 7Bl3 of Hafeezpet Village, Serilingampally Mandal. Rangareddy District, without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 14. 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and ownership of the
petitioners over their property bearing plot No.63 admeasuring 2710 Sq. yds., equivalent to 2265.56 Sq. Mtrs., situated in Sy.No. 7Bt3 of Hafeezpet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District, without following due process of law.
IA NO:1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to interdict the 3rd and 4th respondents from dispossessing the petitioners from their property admeasuring 2710 Sq. yds., equivalent to 2265.56 Sq. Mtrs., situated in Sy.No. 7813 of Hafeezpet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy Drstrict.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: AGp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI C.BUCHI BABU, SC FOR TSHB The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY IVRIT PETITION NO.34649 of 2024 ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail the remedies available under law.
2. Sri C. Buchi Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Housing Board appearing for respondent No.4 submitted that on the very same subject property, the petitioners already instituted a suit uide O.S.No.S7O of 2024 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District and the same is pending for adjudication.
3.
Permission as sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioners is accorded.
4.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting the liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs. 5.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition shall stand dismissed.
SD/-A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// cTl N OFFICER To,
1. One CC to M/s. INDUS LAW FIRM' Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI C.BUCHI BABU, SC FOR TSHB [OPUC] \
3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
4. Two CD CoPies BSR GJP
HIGH COURT DATED: 1011212024 rE ( t
ORDER
oo 2I Jtil 2025 WP.No.34649 of 2024 t t-l DA.T DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS @ A1 l^K l,t