M/S. Ghr Lakshmi Urban Blocks Infra Llp, v. The State Of Telangana
[ 3166 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 34565 OF 2024 Between:
M/s. GHR Lakshmi Urban Blocks Infra LLP, A Registered Firm with Limited Liability, Rep.by its Designated Partner, M.Karteesh Reddy S/o. Sri M.Sudhakar Reddy Age-34 years, Occ- Business, Rl/o.Plot No.76, Road No.'10, Film Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Department of lVlunicipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Rep.by its Metropolitan Commissioner, Swarnajayanthi Complex, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in demanding Betterment Ctarges/User Charges, vide Letter, d1.04.11.2024 bearing No.003505/8P/HMDA/0728/SKP 12024 of Rs. 1 4,65,80,865/-, while considering the application of the petitioner for Building Permission in respect of Plot No.14, Sy.no.239 and 240 of Kokapet Village, Gandipet Mandal, R.R.
District as illegal, arbitrary an unco nstitutional and to set aside the said demand and to issue a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the application of the petitioner for Building Permission, dt.30.O3.2024, without insisting for payment of Better Charges/User Charges of Rs. 14,65,80,8651 lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Letter, dt. 0411112024 of the 2nd respondent bearing No.
BettermentCharges/UserChargesofRs.14,65,80,865/-,forsancticlnofBuilding Permission in the petitioner, pe;ding disposal of the Writ Petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. VEDULA CHITRALEKHA counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V. NARASIMHA GOUD' SC FOR HMDA The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.34565 0F 20.24 ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dt.O6.O2.2025 before the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ petition. Learned counsel reiterates the said request in the open Court. 2.
Learned Sri V. Narasimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 has no objection for withdrawal of the Writ petition by the petitioners. 3.
Granting permission as sought, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/.V. HARI PRASAD ASSI T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To,1. One CC to SMT. VEDULA CHITRALEKHA, Advocate IOPUC]
2. One CC to SRI V. NARASIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADN/INISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
4. Two CD Copies BN r, BS
HIGH COURT DATED:0710212025 ) '"7 I H€ SI4 of
ORDER
P 2a affi 1rl i.i . ,)- WP.No.34565 of 2024 -j| b^.- .- _=:_:-- * lli DISMISSING BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS z;t(d,td 19'
\o