R. Shiva Prasad v. The District Educational Officer

/ [32s5 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD IUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED NO: 3976 OF 2017 Between:

R. SHIVA PRASAD, S/o Bala Chandraiah, Aged about 31 Years, Occ: S.G.Teacher, O/o MPUPS, Vallabhapur, Lingal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ...APPLICANT AND 1 . The District Educational Officer, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District. 50900'1

2. The Director of School Education, Telangana State at Hyderabad - 500 004

3. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Telangana Secretariat at Hyderabad - 5O0 O22 ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to allow the applicant to participate in the ensuing transfer counseling on par with similarly situated teachers who were not relieved till date though they were transferred during the transfer counseling of May, 2013 like the applicant herein by counting his entire service till date and awarding entitlement points, by holding the action of the respondents in relieving the applicant now after lapse of more than (2) years as per the transfer orders dated: 15-5-2013 and further depriving him to participate in the ensuing transfer counseling by accepting his application and further not giving any weightage for the service rendered beyond 2013 till date as per Transfer Rules issued Vide GO Ms No.

12, dated: 16-06-2015 is as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and subversive of Articles 14, 16 of the Constitution of lndia. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH.

/ HONOURAtsI,E SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WI.I.IT PETITION No.3976 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive For further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing foi respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand l closed. No order as to cost.

SD/-K.AMMAJI ASSIST,ANT REGISTRAR (- ,."

V,'

SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI CH. JAGANNATHA RAO, Advocate tOpUCl

2. Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, Hiqh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies //TRUE COPY// BB BB $b

--+- -*..,-e.**"rc*h*.i#i \ \ HIGH COURT DATED: 2011212022

ORDER

W.P (TR).No.3976 of 2017 + 1 trE S l4;'

o 2 0 J[!{ 2tr4 6i * DrsMrssrNG THE WRIT PETITION (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS G\a{a %1* bt'1