G. Nagamani v. The District Educational Officer
[ 32ss ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 4510 OF 2017 Between:
1. G. Nagamani, D/o Lachaiah, aged _about 49 years, Occ:S.G.Teacher, M.P.P.School, Peddamoola, Nalgonda Dist.
2. R. Ravindar , S/o Ramulu, aged about 39 years, Occ:S.G.Teacher, M.P.P.School, Subashnagar, Nalgonda Dist.
...APPLICANTS AND The District Educational Officer, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Govt. of Telangana at Hyderabad.
The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Telangana Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare that the applicants are entitled to participate in th ensuing transfer counseling by applying and availing all the points issued in G.O.Ms.No.12 dt.1 6.06.2015 by counter their entire service till date and preferential points with all consequential benefits by holding the action of the respondents relieving them as per the transfer counseling as per the transfer counseling held in the year 2013 by virtue of the Rule-6(iii)(b) fo G.O.tt/s.No.12 dt.16.06.2015 is clearly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and unjust and not giving any weightage for the service rendered beyond 2013 till date is clearly illegal. Counsel for the Applicants : SRI. M RAMGOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN I(UMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.4510 OF 2017 ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of this petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and no further orders are required in this Petition. 2.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending/ shall stand closed. No order as to cost.
SD/-L.SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANXEGISTRAR //IRUE coPY// eiD / SECTION OFFICER To,'1. One CC to SRl. M RAMGOPAL RAO, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies KAR s*Fr
\ HIGH COURT DATED:1 211212022
ORDER
WP(TR).No.4510 of 2017 'a i r', E St4 r..c !) ( 'f a 3 0 JAri 2023 / t>5<r DlsMtsstNG THE WR|T PET|T|ON(TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS c qnz\ tc- ;^[:,]