High Court for State of TelanganaCRLRC/2914/2015disposed of no costs

Y. Bhanu Prakash, v. State Of Telangana,

2015-11-27T.Sunil Chowdary2 pages

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Crl.R.C.No.2914 of 2015

ORDER

The present criminal revision case is directed against the order dated 07.10.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.881 of 2015 in M.C.No.134 of 2015 by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Casecum-Additional Family Court, Hyderabad.

2. Heard and perused the material on record.

3. During the pendency of M.C.No.134 of 2015, the second and third respondents being the wife and son of petitioner filed Crl.M.P.881 of 2015 claiming interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/-per month each. The trial Court after considering the monthly income of the petitioner, who was doing business by running an Internet shop, granted interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/-per month each to the second and third respondents from the date of the petition till disposal of the maintenance case. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present revision.

4. The relationship between the parties is not in dispute. The trial Court, after taking the various circumstances into consideration, granted the said interim maintenance to the second and third respondents. Apparently, the order impugned is an interim in nature. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, the trial Court is directed to dispose of M.C.No.134 of 2015 within a period of three months from the date

of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,500/- per month each to the second and third respondents towards interim maintenance on or before 10th of every succeeding month. The petitioner is further directed to pay the arrears, if any, to the second and third respondents calculating at the rate fixed by this Court in three equal monthly installments commencing from the month of December, 2015. The payments, if any made, have to be adjusted accordingly. The trial Court shall dispose of the said M.C. on merits without being influenced by the observations of this Court.

5. With the above said modification of the impugned order, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 27th November, 2015 sj