L. Manaswitha, D/O.L.Nalinikanth, v. The State Of Telangana, Rep.By Its Principal Secretary,

I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Delivered on :11-07-2017 Coram :

WRI T PETI TI ON No.22753 of 2017 Betw een:

1. L. Sai Manaswitha, D/o. L. Nalinikanth

2. L. Saikanth, S/o. L. Nalinikanth, minor rep. by his mother L/N. Sobharani, W/o. L. Nalinikanth, both are R/o. 19-897, Nagarjuna Nagar, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District, 508207.

Petitioners Vs.

1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Medical & Health Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. Sri Kaloji Narayanarao University of Health Sciences, rep. by its Registrar, Warangal.

3. The Employees State Insurance Corporation, rep. by its Director General, Panchdeep Bhavan, C.I.G. Road, New Delhi - 110 002.

4. The Telangana E.S.I. Corporation, Telangana Regional Office, rep. by its Director, 5-9-23, Hill Fort Road, Hyderabad-63.

5. The Telangana E.S.I. Corporation, Branch Office, rep. by its Branch Manager, L.B. Nagar Main Road, Hyderabad.

6. The E.S.I. Medical College, Sanathnagar, rep. by its Principal, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad.

Respondent/claimants Counsel for the petitioners : Mr. T.S. Rayalu Counsel for respondent No.1 : G.P. for Medical and Health Counsel for respondent No.2 : Mr. A. Prabhakar Rao Counsel for respondent Nos. 3 to 6: Mr. B.G. Ravinder Reddy

VRS,J & NBY,J.

W.P.No.22753 of 2017 WRI T PETI TI ON No.22753 of 2017 ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian) Heard Mr. T.S. Rayalu, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Mr. A. Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel takes notice for the 2nd respondent-university. Mr. Ravinder Reddy takes notice for respondents 3 to 6.

3. The short grievance with which the petitioner came up with the above writ petition is that though the petitioner applied for issuance of a certificate under the quota for "Ward of insured person certificates", she was not issued with such a certificate for the current academic year 2017-18.

4. On instructions Mr. B.G. Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel for the E.S.I. Corporation submitted that there were two candidates with the same registration number and that therefore, the E.S.I. Corporation wanted to check the credentials of both the candidates before issuing the certificate. Now the Corporation has checked the credentials of both and the Corporation has come to the conclusion that the petitioner is entitled to be issued with a certificate. The learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation assured that the petitioner can get a certificate and can upload her application today.

5. In view of the above no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner may be permitted to upload her application under the quota "ward of insured persons".

6. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________ JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN __________________ JUSTI CE N. BALAYOGI 11th July, 2017 Js.

VRS,J & NBY,J.

W.P.No.22753 of 2017 WRI T PETI TI ON No.19637 of 2017 (Per VRS,J) 11th July, 2017 Js.