Y. Ram Reddy, v. State Of Telangana, Rep By Its Public Prosecutor,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.6309 of 2015 Between:
Y.Ram Reddy ..... PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State of Telangana, rep.by its Public Prosecutor and another .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.6309 of 2015 ORDER:
The criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to quash the impugned order dated 23.06.2015 passed by the learned XIII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar in Crl.MP No.82/2015 in Crl.R.P.No.55/2015, by and under which, the learned Sessions Judge refused to grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.122/2014 before the trial Court.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State. The petitioner/Accused filed a petition being Crl.M.P.No.194/2015 in C.C.No.122/2014 before the trial Court seeking to send the impugned cheque for expert opinion. The trial Court dismissed the said application.
Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner/accused filed revision before the Court below vide Crl.R.P.No.55/2015. In the said revision petition, the petitioner/accused filed Crl.MP.No.82/20015 seeking interim stay of all further proceedings before the trial Court in CC.No.122/2014. Having observed that the revision is filed against dismissal of Crl.MP No.194/2015 said to have been filed under Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act, and the revisional court does not empower to order stay of all proceedings before the trial court, the Court below dismissed the said petition. Against the said order, the present criminal petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having considered all the aspects, I deem it appropriate to direct the Court below to dispose of the pending revision petition as expeditiously as possible to meet the ends of justice.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, and the Court below is directed to dispose of Crl.R.P.No.55/2015, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed in consequence.
__________________ M.S.K.JAISWAL,J Date: 15.07.2015 Dsr