B. Anjaneyulu v. The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission

[ 32ss ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 14'12 OF 2017 Between:

B. ANJANEYULU, Age: 30 years, Occ: School Assistant (English), Gorrt. Tribal Welfare Ashram High School (G), Jangam Reddy Pally, Amrabad Ivlandal, Mahboobnagar District.

...APPLICANT AND

1. The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Gruhakalpa, Nampally, Hyderabad, Represented by its Secretary. 500 001

2. The District Tribal Welfare Officer, Mahaboobnagar District, Mahaboobnagar 509 001

3. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Tribal welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5OO O22 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondent no. "l in giving wrong options in the question paper-ll and also giving wrong answers in the answer key in the departmental test conducted for promotion to the post of gazetted officer in Education department in pursuance of the notification issued by the 1st respondent vide notification no.

2O12012 and not awarding marks lo the said wrong options by depriving the opportunity to the applicant in getting promotion as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust, against the principles of natural justice, equity and fair play and consequently direct the 1st respondent to award four marks to the applicant for the wrong options given by the 1st respondent for question no. 9, 15, 89 & 95 of Paper-lI and further declare that the applicant is entitled for promotion as gazette officer in the educational department in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. SURENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SC FOR APPSC Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER

HOi.IOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION R) No.1412 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost SD/.I. NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER I To,

1. One CC to SRI S. SURENDER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SC FOR TSPSC, Advocate [OPUC]

3. i;" CCs to GP FoR TRIBAL WELFARE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. Two CD CoPies BN GJP J

HIGH COURT DATED:0310112023

ORDER

WP(TR).No.1412 ot 2017 5iATE Oi'

l. ^\ ii tl $l\ $n r'i ,t n DSi,'

DrsMrssrNc THE WRIT PETTTTON (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS t u$v