Jarpula Arvind, v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.14630 of 2025 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail, who is arrayed as accused in FIR No.1235 of of Meerpet Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 115(2) r/w 3(5) of the BNS.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that, on 25.09.2025, the defacto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that the petitioner herein and the de-facto complainant are friends and on 24.09.2025, when LW-1, who is the de-facto complainant, knocked on the door, his wife did not open the door. Thereafter, he noticed that his wife is speaking with accused No.1 and his wife and accused No.1 quarreled with the de-facto complainant and accused No.1 pushed the de-facto complainant from 2nd floor, due to which the de-facto complainant sustained fractured injuries. Hence, he requested

for necessary action. Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case for the above said offences. 3.

Heard Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence and he is in jail from 26.09.2025 and the material part of the investigation was already completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition. 5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the allegations leveled against the petitioner are serious in nature. He further submitted that knowingly the petitioner herein pushed the de-facto complainant from 2nd floor to kill him and thereafter, the de-facto complainant sustained grievous injury, which is severe in nature. Further, the investigation was not yet completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.

6.

In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon a perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner herein is in jail from 26.09.2025. Further, as seen from the record, LWs 1 to 7 witnesses were already examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, including the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, and the duration of incarceration, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner/accused, subject to the following conditions:

i.

The petitioner/accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar.

ii.

The petitioner/accused shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner/accused shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 18.11.2025 TU

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.14630 of 2025 Date: 18.11.2025 TU