P.G. Eeranna, Anantapur Dist. v. The Govt.Of A.P.,Home,Hyd.,And ANR.

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.12293 of 2014 ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2.

2.

The prayer of the writ petition is as under:

" For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus under Article 226 of Constitution of India, declaring the action of the second respondent in interfering with the civil disputes during pendency of the civil suits/ appeals pending before the respective courts for adjudication, meanwhile the 2nd respondent pressurizing the petitioner to settle the issue by providing some of the lands in favour of Bhagyamma who is claiming as a concubine of the petitioner's late father, as illegal, improper, arbitrary, and nothing but abuse of process of law and pass such other order or orders as this Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

3.

The main grievance of the petitioner is that the second respondent is interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and others. The learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 during the course of hearing placed on record the written instructions dated 02.05.2014 received from the Sub-Inspector of Police, Gudibanda, Anantapur District. The perusal of the said instructions would reveal that the second respondent never summoned the petitioner to the police station. As of now, no criminal case is registered against the petitioner on the file of the second respondent police station. The second respondent never harassed or threatened and also never interfered with the life,

liberty and civil dispute of the petitioner and the said Bhagyamma at any point of time.

In the light of the said statement made by the second respondent in the written instructions, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. __________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J Date:06.11.2018 ccm

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.12293 of 2014 Date:06.11.2018 ccm