Pokala Ramu, v. Kambampati Sudharshan

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No: Writ Appeal No.1395 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET S.

No.

DATE

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 1.

13.12.2024 CJ & JSR, J Note:

Transferred to (i/o) folder before corrections, if any.

B/o lur I.A.No.1 of 2024 (Leave Petition) Mr. R.Dheeraj Singh, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. Pasham Mohith, learned counsel for respondents No.6 and 7.

Mr. Mahesh Raje, learned Government Pleader for Home Department appears for respondent No.8. Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the appellant is permitted to file this appeal.

In the result, the aforesaid Interlocutory I.A.No.2 of 2024 (Dispense with Petition) Mr. R.Dheeraj Singh, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. Pasham Mohith, learned counsel for respondents No.6 and 7.

Mr. Mahesh Raje, learned Government Pleader for Home Department appears for respondent No.8. Heard on I.A.No.2 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the requirement of filing a certified copy of the impugned order is dispensed with.

In the result, the aforesaid Interlocutory I.A.No.3 of 2024 (Condone Delay Petition) Mr. R.Dheeraj Singh, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. Pasham Mohith, learned counsel for respondents No.6 and 7.

Mr. Mahesh Raje, learned Government Pleader for Home Department appears for respondent No.8. Heard on I.A.No.3 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, we find that sufficient

cause for condonation of delay of 13 days in filing the appeal is made out.

In the result, delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the aforesaid Interlocutory CJ & JSR, J Writ Appeal is disposed of.

(vide separate judgment) B/o Lur