Beni Madho Singh ( Bm Singh) v. The Union Of India

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WP No.33008 of 2018 ORDER:

The petitioner is a licensee and running a catering stall on platform no.1 at Vishakapatnam, the lease being for a period of five years commencing from 20-09-2013 to 19-09-2018.

The grievance of the petitioner is that petitioner he has made an application on 12-02-2018 to the 2nd respondent seeking for renewal of license for a further period of three weeks, which according to the petitioner is permissible under Clause 3.1 & 3.2 of the guidelines for allotment of stalls, but the same has not been disposed of till date. Hence, this writ petition.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned standing counsel for respondent-Railways submits that the respondent-Railways has devised a new policy in the year 2017 and under the new policy, a decision is taken not to renew the license, whose license is for a period of five years

and such of those licensees on expiry of their lease period have to participate in the open tender auction, if they intend to take the stalls on lease for further period.

It is to be seen that the petitioner is an existing license and his lease period is upto 19-09-2018 and he has made an application to renew the same. The respondent-authorities cannot sit over the application of the petitioner without passing orders thereon. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the competent authority to dispose of the application of the petitioner dated 12-02-2018 and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law by taking into account the applicable policy regarding extension of license and intimate the decision taken to the petitioner. Miscellaneous petitions if any pending shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J Dated: 19-09-2018 NRG

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WP No.33008 of 2018 //WEB// Dated: 19-09-2018 NRG