Progressive Engineering College, Nalgonda Dist. v. Prl. Secy., Higher Education Dept. And 2 ORS.

l32s2l HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANOA WRIT PETITION NO: 7165 OF 2014 Between:

Progressive Engineering College, Cheekatimamidi Village, Via Bhongir Nalgonda District - 508116 Rep., by its Secretary/Correspondent M.Sharada ...PETITIONER ANO

1. Government of AP Rep by Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat Building, Saifabad, Hyderabad

2. The State Board of Technical Education, Rep., by its, Secretary, 7th Floor, DRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad

3. Convenor, POLYCET - 2013 (Admissions), Sankethika Vidya Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad - 500028 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in disapproving the admissions made by the petitioner by way of spot admissions of 25 students (21 Mech. 4 Civ) listed in (Annexure-A) in to the petitioner college in the l st year on the ground that they hail from outside the State of A'P' in Lr. No. POLYCET 2013/INST.SPOT ADMNS/ ENGGi and D.

PHARMACY / CONVENOR 1-8-2013 as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional set aside the same with a consequential direction to approve the admissions of 25 students (listed in Annexure-A) into petitioner college in l st year Polytechnic courses for the Academic year 2013-14 l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP.

direct the respondents no. 2 and 3 to permit the 25 students listed in Annexure-A in W.P. studying in Petitioner College to prosecute their studies in their respective programmes of the Polytechnic Course, including appearance in examinations, issuance of hall tickets, by receiving the examination fees, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. GONAMANDA NARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRt P. V. S. S. S. RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.3: - The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION No.7165 ol2Ot4 t t

ORDER

The petitioner approached this Court seeking the relief as under:

"to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3'd respondent in disapproving the admissions made by the petitioner by way of spot admissions of 25 students (21 Mech. 4 Civ) listed in (Annexure-A) into the petitioner college in the 1't year Polytechnic Course on the ground that they hail from outside the State of A. P, in Lr. No. POLYCET 2013/INST.SPOT ADMNS/ENGG/and D.PHARMACY / CONVENOR 1.8.2013 as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional set aside the same with a consequential direction to approve the admissions of 25 students (listed in Annexure-A) into petitioner college in 1't year Polytechnic Courses for the Academic year 2013-14 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. "

2. It is represented by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication any more. 3.

Bringing the said submission on record, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

SD/-P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSTSTANT RfctSTRAR \ SECTIOilI OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY//

1. Two CCs to GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATTON ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

2. One CC to SRl. P. V. S. S. S. RAMA RAO, Advocate tOpUCI

3. One CC to SRl. GONAMANDA NARASTMHA, Advocate tOpUCI

4. Two CD Copies BM SB

HIGH COURT DATED:04/0112024 (- T o \ , .St \ \ \ t +

ORDER

WP.No.7165 of 2014 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS t w