Abburi Sowkhya, v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI WRIT PETITION NO.45702 OF 2016 DATED:14-06-2017 Between:

Abburi Sowkhya ... Petitioner And The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Telangana Secretariat and others ... Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: Mr. G. Suryanarayana COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.1 to 4: Assistant Government Pleader attached to the office of the Advocate General (TS) COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.5 : Mr. Venkata Rangadas Kanuri THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

CVNR, J & JUD, J WP 45702/2016 ORDER: (per the Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) This writ petition is filed for issue of habeas corpus by directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to produce Smt. Rachamalla Saraswathi, W/o. Abburi Satyanarayana Rao, mother of the petitioner, before this Court and set her at liberty.

Though in the police report given by the petitioner, based on which respondent No.3 has registered FIR No.479 of 2016 under the head 'Woman Missing', she has stated that her mother is missing, in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition the petitioner has suspected respondent No.5 as being responsible for the missing of her mother. In the detailed counter affidavit filed by Mr. M. Sudarshan, Inspector of Police, Chikkadapally, he has stated that the missing woman was in the habit of leaving home and that though family disputes persisted between her and respondent No.5, during the investigation the latter has expressed his innocence regarding whereabouts of the missing woman. It is further averred that the Police are making hectic efforts for tracing the missing woman and the investigation is still in progress.

In the light of the above noted averments contained in the counter affidavit, we are of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping this writ petition pending. Respondent No.3 is directed to complete the investigation and file an appropriate report before the jurisdictional Court within two months from today. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by such report, she shall be free to avail appropriate remedies available to her in law.

CVNR, J & JUD, J WP 45702/2016 Subject to the liberty given to the petitioner as above, the writ petition is dismissed.

__________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J _________________________ J. UMA DEVI, J 14-06-2017 bnr